Kinematics and kinetics were recorded using an instrumented trans

Kinematics and kinetics were recorded using an instrumented transfer assessment system. Based on kinetic and kinematic measurements, a relative threshold-based algorithm was developed to identify

four distinct phases: pre-lift, upper arm loading, lift-pivot and post-lift phases. To determine the stability of the algorithm between the two SPTs, Student t-tests for dependent samples were performed on the absolute duration of each phase.\n\nResults: The mean total duration of the SPT was 2.00 +/- 0.49 s. The mean duration of the pre-lift, upper arm loading, lift-pivot and post-lift phases were 0.74 +/- 0.29 s, 0.28 +/- 0.13 s, 0.72 +/- 0.24 s, 0.27 +/- 0.14 s whereas their relative contributions represented approximately 35%, 15%, 35% and 15% of the overall SPT cycle, respectively. No significant differences were found between the trials (p = 0.480-0.891).\n\nConclusion: The relative threshold-based algorithm this website used to automatically detect the four distinct phases of the SPT, is rapid, accurate and repeatable. A quantitative and thorough description

of the precise phases of the SPT is prerequisite to better interpret biomechanical findings and measure task performance. The algorithm could also become clinically useful to refine the assessment and training of SPTs.”
“Aim To assess the QNZ order accuracy and reproducibility of biometry undertaken with the Aladdin (Topcon, Tokyo, VX809 Japan) in comparison with the current gold standard device, the IOLMaster 500 (Zeiss, Jena, Germany). Setting University Eye Clinic, Birmingham, UK and Refractive Surgery Centre, Kiel, Germany. Methods The right eye of 75 patients with cataracts and 22 healthy participants were assessed using the two devices. Measurements of axial length (AL), anterior chamber depth (ACD) and keratometry (K) were undertaken with the Aladdin and IOLMaster 500 in random order by an experienced practitioner. A second practitioner then obtained measurements

for each participant using the Aladdin biometer in order to assess interobserver variability. Results No statistically significant differences (p bigger than 0.05) between the two biometers were found for average difference (AL)+/- 95% CI=0.01 +/- 0.06 mm), ACD (0.00 +/- 0.11 mm) or mean K values (0.08 +/- 0.51 D). Furthermore, interobserver variability was very good for each parameter (weighted kappa bigger than = 0.85). One patient’s IOL powers could not be calculated with either biometer measurements, whereas a further three could not be analysed by the IOLMaster 500. The IOL power calculated from the valid measurements was not statistically significantly different between the biometers (p=0.842), with 91% of predictions within +/- 0.25 D. Conclusions The Aladdin is a quick, easy-to-use biometer that produces valid and reproducible results that are comparable with those obtained with the IOLMaster 500.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>