[1, 21, 22] However, as early as 1961, the ulnar artery was repor

[1, 21, 22] However, as early as 1961, the ulnar artery was reported as larger than the radial artery in the forearm proximally, while the radial artery was found to be the larger artery of the two distally.[23] In addition,

the ulnar artery’s common interosseous branch and muscular branches form within centimeters of the brachial bifurcation, making the radial artery the dominant source of blood flow to the hand.[21, 24] Multiple studies, including radioisotropic and volume plethysmographic tests, clearly indicate that the radial artery at the level of the wrist holds a much greater volume of blood to the hand than the ulnar artery.[17, 21, 25-27] Removal of the ulnar artery for an UFFF should thus induce little to no vascular compromise of the distal forearm and hand. The blood supply to the hand has been suggested as a single vascular bed not primarily dependent click here on the ulnar or radial artery, with the radial artery cable of compensating for ulnar blood flow loss more so than the ulnar artery is able to compensate for the radial artery.[18, 26] In addition to www.selleckchem.com/products/Deforolimus.html vascular compromise secondary to removal of the radial artery with RFFFs, the RFFF poses significant disadvantages due to donor site morbidity.[7] With the RFFF, the flexor tendons are exposed, making successful closure of the area with a skin graft less likely due to excessive wound healing complications.[7]

Sieg et

al.[2] directly compared outcomes of the UFFF to the RFFF and noted decreased donor site morbidity after skin grafting in addition to decreased rates of dehiscence. While tendon exposure is possible with large UFFFs, Montelukast Sodium smaller flaps reduce this possibility and often allow for direct closure, unlike RFFFs; in fact, UFFFs have been recommended for repair of the forearm defect due to RFFFs.[28] Donor site morbidity incidence after radial forearm flap (osteocutaneous) harvest has been further elaborated in a recent publication.[29] The UFFF is a unique free flap for use in the head and neck. The flap includes the ulnar artery distal to its common interosseous branch, with or without the flexor carpi ulnaris muscle, palmaris longus tendon, medial cutaneous nerve, and bone as needed.[3, 10, 30] Prior to surgery, an Allen’s test is almost universally performed to determine radial or ulnar artery dominance in the hand. The UFFF is often employed when an Allen’s test/modified Allen’s test is positive, indicating the blood flow to the hand is radial-dominant with insufficient collateral flow through the ulnar artery to adequate perfuse the hand. In the studies reviewed, the UFFF was clearly preferred over other flaps, particularly the RFFF, for use in head and neck reconstructive surgeries. As our review has shown, the UFFF rarely results in flap loss or donor site morbidity.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>