The pattern in Figure  3b becomes donut-shaped, and in the patter

The pattern in Figure  3b becomes donut-shaped, and in the pattern is the nanopillar with a pillar width of 71 nm. In Figure  3c, the nanopillar is almost located at the center of the pattern, and its pillar

diameter is around 58 nm. The cross-sectional drawing (Figure  3d,e,f) reflect the asymmetry of depth in the patterns as well as the nonuniformly distributed light intensity. The depth of the left-side pit in Figure  3f is larger than that in Figure 3e, d, while the depth of the two pits in Figure  3a is the smallest. This result indicates that the focal spot has a concentrated and better symmetry of intensity distribution in the case of Figure  3c. Figure 3 AFM images of typical nanopillars. (a) Near the rim of the pit. (b) Close to the center of the pit. (c) At the center of the pit. (d) Cross section of pattern Selleckchem EPZ015666 in (a). (e) Cross section of pattern in (b). (f) Cross section of pattern (c). Comparing the experimental pillars in Figure  2 with Elafibranor molecular weight the laser spot shown in Figure  1b, as well as in Figure  3, it seems that the nanopillars’ location deviated a little from the

center of the donut-shaped beam. Meanwhile, the entire donut-shaped pattern seems changed to an elliptical shape rather than a cylindrical donut shape. In order to fabricate large area-distributed nanopillar/pore array with high consistency with the system, the reasons of the nanoscale patterns transformed are systematical analyzed. It is well known that the transformation of donut-shaped patterns might be caused by the laser quality, the photoresist surface Teicoplanin roughness, the optical system errors, or laboratory personnel operational interferences. However, this phenomenon should not be caused by the laser

beam quality because the laser focal spot has a symmetric donut shape on the focal plane which is shown in Figure  1b. Otherwise, the surface roughness should not be the issue that can be clarified in Figure  2c in which the coating photoresist surface is flat. During lithography, the laser beam is well aligned to expose the resist vertically; thus, shape deformation is not caused by a tilt photoresist wafer. Besides the factors OICR-9429 purchase mentioned above, optical system errors can affect laser distribution. Spherical aberration, coma, and astigmatism are three primary factors of optical system errors. In general, the focal spot cannot be transformed to an irregular shape under the influence of spherical aberration. On the contrary, coma may cause one-directional deformation of the focal spot, while astigmatism can split the laser spot into two parts. There are two more factors: one is that this kind of laser lithography system is not sensitive to the influence of the spherical aberration; another is that the objective is designed as an aplanatic lens which eliminates the spherical aberration of the objective. Taking these factors into account, theoretical analysis and numerical calculation will be focused on the influences of coma and astigmatism effect.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>