Taken together, these data AZD2014 indicate that the mechanism for HGF suppression

is downstream of the multiple levels of Smad regulation and may involve a combination of decreased nuclear localization of activated Smad1/5/8 as well as induction of transcriptional corepressors such as TGIF. HGF activates signaling pathways through its receptor, tyrosine kinase Met. Met signaling is complex, branching into multiple distinct but interacting signaling modules, so that HGF suppression of BMP signaling to hepcidin may be the product of more than one downstream signal from HGF/Met (Supporting Fig. S7). Using primary hepatocytes treated with BMP6, we performed a limited screen with small-molecule kinase inhibitors against individual kinase pathways known to be activated by HGF. The

proof of principle experiment tested for inhibition of HGF signaling by a kinase see more inhibitor for the Met receptor itself (PHA665752). Inhibition of the Met receptor abrogated HGF suppression of both hepcidin mRNA and ID1 mRNA (Fig. 8A,B). Interestingly, the dose required to inhibit HGF (1 μM) was 20 times the median inhibitory concentration (IC50) (25-50 nM) for inhibition of receptor activation in epithelial cell lines (kidney, lung, and mammary cells). The requirement for high doses of inhibitor may be due to the hepatocyte cell membrane resistance to permeation of small molecule

kinase inhibitors, akin to difficulties with the transfection of primary hepatocyte using Niclosamide liposomal methods. Alternatively, the known catabolic activity of hepatocytes toward small organic molecules may cause rapid degradation of many of our inhibitors. Bearing this in mind, we examined a higher range of inhibitor concentrations. Two MAPK pathways are known to be activated by HGF: Rac1/JNK and Ras/MEK/ERK. Two Rac1 inhibitors (5 μM EHT1864, 94 μM NSC23766) did not inhibit HGF suppression of hepcidin mRNA, nor did JNK inhibition (1 μM, JNK Inhibitor II). With MEK1/2 inhibitor U0126, we observed partial reversal of HGF suppression of hepcidin mRNA (Fig. 8C) as well as ID1 mRNA (Fig. 8D). The ERK inhibitor peptide II (5 μM) recapitulated these data (data not shown). The high dose of U0126 (25 μM) reversed HGF suppression of hepcidin and ID1, but it also affected the baseline hepcidin and ID1 mRNA, indicating that the activity of the inhibitor at 25 μM may have effects not specific to HGF. These data indicate at most a partial role for HGF/MEK signaling to hepcidin; alternatively, inhibition of MEK1/2 may result in mild hepcidin increase by mechanisms independent of HGF. Broadening our focus, we sought to rule out other major pathways downstream of the Met receptor (Supporting Fig. S7). Small-molecule inhibitors of protein kinase C (1.